SMI Springmakers
About SMI SMI Members SMI Servics SMI Education SMI Software SMI Publications SMI Contact SMI Store

October 2006 Vol.45 No. 4

FEATURES
Preventive Maintenance Tips for Your Inline Conveyor Ovens - Part II: The Insulated Box
By Daniel Pierre III, JN Machinery Corp.

Anatomy of a CNC Coiler
What to look for in the various machine elements when choosing a compression spring coiler
By Takashi Takumi, Shinko Machinery Co. Ltd.

Just Droopy Enough
A new approach to coiling tooling and coiling machine control helps springmakers meet medical spring flexibility requirements
By Howard A. Greis, Kine-Spin/Sleeper Division - Kinefac Corp.

Why CNC Spring Coilers?
Though it may seem too expensive to invest in modern
equipment, not upgrading may actually cost you more in the long run
By Chris Dix, RK Trading Co.

Tailor Made
Stainless strip supplier customizes material grades to meet springmakers’ requirements
By Will Keenan, Ulbrich Specialty Strip Mill

New Technology
Machinery suppliers discuss trends and innovations in spring equipment
By Raquel Chole, special contributor

Spring World, Oct. 18-20, 2006, Preview of Exhibits

Exacting Standards
Measuring perpendicularity and parallelism (E1 and E2) of compression springs using vision technology
By Larry Sheiman, SAS Inc.

A Machine for the Production of Sophisticated Extended Loop Springs
By Matthias Grauer, Wafios AG

COLUMNS
Spotlight on the Shop Floor
CNC Coilers are Here to Stay
By Randy DeFord, Mid-West Spring & Stamping

Be Aware: Safety Tips From Jim Wood
OSHA’s Top Money Makers for 2005

Technically Speaking with Luke Zubek
Inclusions in Steel: Where do they come from?

IST Spring Technology
Compression Spring Equipment, Design and Non-Axial Performance
By Mark Hayes

Checkpoint: Business Tips From Phil Perry
Forecast 2007: What factors will influence next year’s spring business climate

Motivation Management
Creating a Legacy: What will you leave behind?
By Roz Usheroff, The Usheroff Institute

DEPARTMENTS
President’s Message:
Technology Advances Springmaking Process

Global Highlights

Inside SMI:

New Products

Snapshot:
Stanley J. Banas, Stanley Spring and Stamping Corp.

be aware-new.eps

OSHA’s Top Money Makers for 2005

Each year we try to keep the spring industry abreast of OSHA’s activities and where their efforts have been concentrated.

OSHA’s fiscal year ending September 2005 was much like past years with a few exceptions. During 2005, OSHA issued more willful violations than in any previous year – 62 percent more than in 2004. Also, there were more un-programmed inspections, more inspections resulting from employee complaints, and more inspections based on referrals from other agencies.

The following is a list of the 25 most frequently violated standards for general industry with initial penalties:

1. Hazard Communication
– Written program $464

2. Machine Guarding $1,932

3. Hazard Communication
– Lack of training $228

4. Machine Guarding
– Point of operation $2,304

5. First aid/eye wash/shower
– Too far from employees $1,154

6. Guarding floor openings,
platforms, runways $1,752

7. Lockout – Establish
energy control program $1,151

8. Bench grinders – Guards
not adjusted properly $391

9. Hazard Communication
– Chemicals without MSDS $138

10. Lockout – No written energy
control procedure $1,720

11. Respiratory protection
– No medical evaluation $674

12. Respiratory protection
– No written program $683

13. Electrical wiring methods $731

14. Hazard Communication
– Lack of employee information $224

15. Forklifts – Operator training $1,337

16. Hazard Communication
– Labeling containers $329

17. Power Transmission
– Belt and Pulley guarding $1,012

18. Electrical – Approved use $782

19. Lockout – Training and
communication $1,046

20. Abrasive grinders – No work rests $699

21. Electrical – Cabinets, boxes
and covers $683

22. Compressed air
– Excess of 30 p.s.i. $743

23. Lockout – No periodic
program inspection $752

24. Personal protective equipment
– Provide, maintain, use $1,755

25. Hazard Communication
– Maintain current MSDSs $142

OSHA also used the General Duty Clause 1,177 times with an average penalty of $3,154.

Jim’s Regulatory Tip:

Be prepared – Don’t think it can’t happen to you. A Nebraska company selected for a safety inspection under OSHA’s site-specific targeting program was cited in May for 33 safety and health violations and penalties totaling $126,500. The hazards cited covered machine guarding, forklifts, lockout/tagout, electrical equipment, noise, chemical labeling and inadequate employee training.


Jim.epsJim Wood is an independent regulations compliance consultant to the Spring Manufacturers Institute (SMI). A certified instructor of the OSHA Out-Reach Program, Wood conducts seminars, plant Safety Audits and In-House Safety Training. These programs help companies create safer work environments, limit OSHA/Canadian Ministry of Labor violations and insurance costs, and prepare for VPP or SHARP certification. He is also available for safety advice and information by phone at (630) 495-8597 or e-mail at regs@smihq.org.

SMI Springmakers

Home | About SMI | Members | Services | Education | Publications | Software | Contact | Site Map | SMI Store

Spring Manufacturers Institute, Inc. • 2001 Midwest Road, Suite 106. • Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-1335 USA
Phone (630)495-8588  • Fax (630)495-8595